首页> 外文OA文献 >Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Alternative Reinforcement Materials for Bridge Superstructures Considering Cost and Maintenance Uncertainties
【2h】

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Alternative Reinforcement Materials for Bridge Superstructures Considering Cost and Maintenance Uncertainties

机译:考虑成本和维修不确定性的桥梁上部结构替代配筋材料寿命周期费用分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was conducted on prestressed concrete bridges using carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) bars and strands. Traditional reinforcement materials of uncoated steel with cathodic protection and epoxy-coated steel were also considered for comparison. A series of deterministic LCCAs were first conducted to identify a range of expected cost outcomes for different bridge spans and traffic volumes. Then, a probabilistic LCCA was conducted on selected structures that included activity timing and cost random variables. It was found that although more expensive initially, the use of CFRP reinforcement has the potential to achieve significant reductions in life cycle cost, having a 95% probability to be the least expensive alternative beginning at year 23-77 after initial construction, depending on the bridge case considered. In terms of life cycle cost, the most effective use of CFRP reinforcement was found to be for an AASHTO beam bridge in a high traffic volume area.
机译:使用碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)钢筋和钢绞线对预应力混凝土桥梁进行了生命周期成本分析(LCCA)。还比较了传统的带阴极保护的无涂层钢和环氧涂层钢的增强材料。首先进行了一系列确定性LCCA,以识别不同桥梁跨度和交通量的一系列预期成本结果。然后,对包括活动时间和成本随机变量在内的选定结构进行了概率LCCA。已经发现,尽管最初成本更高,但是使用CFRP增强材料有可能实现生命周期成本的显着降低,根据最初的建造时间,从23-77年开始,有95%的可能性是最便宜的选择。考虑过桥案例。在生命周期成本方面,发现CFRP加固最有效的用途是在交通量大的地区使用AASHTO梁桥。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号